--- description: Få detaljerad information om Ideagen Please Review, dess användbarhet, funktioner, pris, fördelar och nackdelar från verifierade användarupplevelser. Läs recensioner och upptäck liknande verktyg på Capterra Sverige. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ideagen Please Review: Pris och betyg 2026 - Capterra Sverige --- Breadcrumb: [Hem](/) > [System för förslagshantering](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [Ideagen Please Review](/software/181953/ideagen-proposal-management-software) # Ideagen Please Review Canonical: https://www.capterra.se/software/181953/ideagen-proposal-management-software > Förenkla processen för att skapa anbud och producera affärsvinnande dokument snabbare med en säker, webbaserad programvarulösning. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 4 users. Top-rated for **Sannolikhet att rekommendera**. ----- ## Overview ### Vem använder Ideagen Please Review? PleaseReview hjälper organisationer i mycket komplexa, starkt reglerade branscher att lösa utmaningarna med dokumentsamarbete. Ju större teamet är, desto större blir fördelarna. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Betygsättning | Detail | | **Totalt** | **4.5/5** | 4 Recensioner | | Enkel användning | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundtjänst | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Valuta för pengarna | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funktioner | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Sannolikhet att rekommendera) | ## Om leverantören - **Företag**: Ideagen - **Founded**: 1993 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (Gratis provperiod) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Moln, SaaS, webb-baserat, Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: engelska - **Available Countries**: Australien, Storbritannien, USA ## Funktioner - Document Check-in/Check-out - Dokumenthantering - Dokumentlagring - Efterlevnadskontroll - Elektronisk underskrift - Ersättningshantering - Kommentarer / Anteckningar - Mallar - RFP-hantering - Revisionshistorik - Samarbetsverktyg - Varningar / Meddelanden - Versionskontroll - Ändringshantering - Åtkomstkontroller / behörigheter ## Support Options - E-post / Kundtjänst - Telefonsupport ## Category - [System för förslagshantering](https://www.capterra.se/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Relaterade kategorier - [System för förslagshantering](https://www.capterra.se/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Samarbetsverktyg](https://www.capterra.se/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Programvara för innehållsamarbeten](https://www.capterra.se/directory/32935/content-collaboration/software) - [Dokumenthanteringssystem](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30063/document-management/software) - [Program för versionshantering](https://www.capterra.se/directory/31421/document-version-control/software) ## Alternativ 1. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.se/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (534 reviews) 2. [M-Files](https://www.capterra.se/software/122215/m-files) — 4.4/5 (275 reviews) 3. [Qualio](https://www.capterra.se/software/134050/quality-management-software) — 4.5/5 (129 reviews) 4. [Zoho Sign](https://www.capterra.se/software/215876/zoho-sign) — 4.5/5 (84 reviews) 5. [Dot Compliance](https://www.capterra.se/software/192574/dot-compliance) — 4.4/5 (87 reviews) ## Recensioner ### "Useful but there's room for improvement" — 4.0/5 > **Verifierad recensent** | *16 februari 2023* | Läkemedel | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: Being able to review a document in parallel with internal and external colleagues. > > **Nackdelar**: It would be useful to be able to magnify the document to fit the type of screen it is viewed on and to quickly get to specific comments that colleagues have replied to without scrolling through the document. > > Good but could be better with some small improvements. ----- ### "Validation of PleaseReview for Veeva vault integration for a client" — 4.0/5 > **Verifierad recensent** | *22 september 2025* | Läkemedel | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: i had supported a client in validation of PleaseReview with Veeva Vault. We had generated UAT Test Scripts with scenarios where we routed documents for collab authoring cycle and review of the documents. The integration was easy and and showed the users what changes/updates are being made and the Author could accept/reject them with reason or not. Good tool to have real time updates being made on a document which assisted in reducing the time to review the document with stakeholders. > > **Nackdelar**: A couple of things I noticed while dry running the UAT scripts is how the document is displayed when opened in PleaseReview. We had created a sample test document with grammatical errors and mistakes so as to have them updated in collab authoring cycle. if the paragraph is short on a single page document the UI shows only that section zoomed in and not the whole page as compared to in Microsoft word document. It would be better if it showed the whole page while making any updates. Also the Header and Footer are not displayed when a user opens the document for review or collab authoring cycle. would like to see that too in future updates. > > We validated PleaseReview with Veeva Vault QMS for collaborative authoring and review cycles. The integration was smooth and made it easy for users to see real-time updates and accept or reject changes, which really sped up stakeholder reviews. A couple of areas for improvement would be showing the full page (instead of zooming in on short sections) and displaying headers/footers during reviews. Overall, it’s a very useful tool that made the document review process much more efficient. ----- ### "Works great for Color Team Reviews" — 5.0/5 > **Brittony** | *9 oktober 2020* | Flyg och rymd | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: I use PleaseReview for Red Team reviews. I load my documents into the software, give authorization to my reviewers all over the company and they can enter comments, show how they would edit text and determine if it's minor or major. Reviewers see each other's comments and can discuss differences. I can determine how long the reviewers have to review and then download the document back into Word with comments. > > **Nackdelar**: We tried to use it as a collaborative vehicle for writing and it didn't work very well for that. Each author had to be assigned a section and then it got complicated. We abandoned that path. One issue we have is authorizing people outside or heritage group after we merged with another company. Only heritage can use it. > > We use it for all our non-advocate reviews and it works great for those we can give access to. ----- ### "Great software and must try\!\!" — 5.0/5 > **Allison** | *4 april 2025* | Flyg och rymd | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Nackdelar**: Not sure as I am only a user. Everything works well for me > > Its user friendly and you can do what you need for your business. The people are easy to work with. Responsive ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.se/software/181953/ideagen-proposal-management-software) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data