--- description: Få detaljerad information om BrowserStack, dess användbarhet, funktioner, pris, fördelar och nackdelar från verifierade användarupplevelser. Läs recensioner och upptäck liknande verktyg på Capterra Sverige. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack: Pris och betyg 2026 - Capterra Sverige --- Breadcrumb: [Hem](/) > [Testautomatisering](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.se/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Nästa: [Next page](https://www.capterra.se/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Testplattform för olika webbläsare för utvecklare som erbjuder testning av mobila applikationer och hemsidor. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 775 users. Top-rated for **Sannolikhet att rekommendera**. ----- ## Overview ### Vem använder BrowserStack? Det korta svaret: alla som designar/utvecklar för den öppna webben. Du behöver inte kunna koda för att använda de interaktiva verktygen för test av olika webbläsare. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Betygsättning | Detail | | **Totalt** | **4.6/5** | 775 Recensioner | | Enkel användning | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundtjänst | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Valuta för pengarna | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funktioner | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Sannolikhet att rekommendera) | ## Om leverantören - **Företag**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Startpris**: 39,00 US$ - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Gratis provperiod) - **Target Audience**: Egenföretagare, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Moln, SaaS, webb-baserat, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: engelska - **Available Countries**: Amerikanska Jungfruöarna, Australien, Brasilien, Brittiska Jungfruöarna, Danmark, Förenade Arabemiraten, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapore, Storbritannien, Sydafrika, Tyskland, USA ## Funktioner - Aktivitetsövervakning - Anteckningar - Arbetsflödeshantering - Arkivering och lagring - Automated Testing - Datavisualisering - Defektspårning - Dokumenthantering - Flaskhalsidentifiering - Fortsatt integration - Förvarshantering - Hierarkisk vy - Incidentshantering - Kravshantering - Kvalitetssäkring - Kvantitativa mätvärden - Ladda scenarier - Lasttestning - Mobil testning - Multiple Test Types - Målgruppsinriktning - Nätverksövervakning - Prestandamätningar - Prestandatester - Prestationshantering - Problemspårning - Programvarutestning - Projektledning - Rapportering och analys - Revisionshantering - Riskhantering - Samarbetsverktyg - Skripttestning - Spårbarhet - Spårning av efterlevnad - Stöder parallell körning - Testa recensioner - Testhantering - Undersökningar och feedback - Upptäckt av avvikelse - Varningar / Meddelanden - Verifieringskedja - Versionskontroll - Videoinspelning / transkriptioner - Webbtestning - Åtkomstkontroller / behörigheter - Övervakning ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - E-post / Kundtjänst - Vanliga frågor / Forum - Baskunskap - Telefonsupport - Chatt ## Category - [Testautomatisering](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Relaterade kategorier - [Testautomatisering](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Verktyg för bugspårning](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Programvara för användartestning](https://www.capterra.se/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Program för prestandatest](https://www.capterra.se/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Verktyg för testhantering](https://www.capterra.se/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternativ 1. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.se/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 2. [Userlytics](https://www.capterra.se/software/181202/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 3. [Hotjar](https://www.capterra.se/software/163516/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (545 reviews) 4. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.se/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 5. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.capterra.se/software/165430/testim) — 4.6/5 (50 reviews) ## Recensioner ### "Amazing tool : browserstack" — 5.0/5 > **Mohit** | *2 april 2026* | Bil | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: I don't have to buy a hundred machines to check different OS and browser communication and interaction. Things can be automated so life was so simple. > > **Nackdelar**: Possibly, you will get addicted to using it. I haven't tried to find a con to be real, I would say it is slightly costly if you are only looking for a few OS/browser combinations which you can find easily in a big organisation. > > Brilliant tool, I recommend it to all my friends and colleauge. Easy to setup, easy to teach and my testing team loves it too. ----- ### "Stable and reliable but" — 4.0/5 > **Omid** | *3 april 2026* | Bil | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: It's stable and reliable, and seems to have a high level of security and maturity. I didn't encounter bugs or glitches that I experienced in some other platforms > > **Nackdelar**: Limited and hard-to-access free trials for some features (eg, Low Code Automation) to try them in small teams in big organizations as a proof of concept > > Overall, it's great, especially for medium or big organizations that can prioritize stability and reliability ----- ### "Great and easy to use\!" — 4.0/5 > **Louise** | *2 april 2026* | Högre utbildning | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: The easiness, its very intuitve and easy to get started with. I really like the result section, its easy to interpret the results and how to work with them. The support is really great and I always get qick and helpful responses. > > **Nackdelar**: Sometimes I feel like I dont know where to begin, it can be a bit overwhelming. There is not an easy way too give a short intruduction when I have to pass to a collegue when Im sick och on vacation, I would like a minimal checks for theese types of short periods so anyone can monitor it without having to know it all. > > Overall I'm very satisfied with BrowserStack. It has all the functionally I want and need in my work. Especially the test management and automation functions makes test so much more efficient, I can realy on the product. ----- ### "Fast and Efficient Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *9 juli 2026* | Informationsteknologi och tjänster | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: BrowserStack is easy to use and offers excellent browser and device coverage for efficient cross-browser testing. It saves time by quickly identifying compatibility issues across different environments. > > **Nackdelar**: The pricing can be expensive for smaller teams, and remote sessions may occasionally experience slight lag. Some advanced features also take time for new users to learn. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very good. It's a reliable and user-friendly platform that makes cross-browser testing fast and efficient. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 april 2026* | Kemikalier | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Nackdelar**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Nästa: [Next page](https://www.capterra.se/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.se/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data