--- description: Få detaljerad information om GitLab, dess användbarhet, funktioner, pris, fördelar och nackdelar från verifierade användarupplevelser. Läs recensioner och upptäck liknande verktyg på Capterra Sverige. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitLab: Pris och betyg 2026 - Capterra Sverige --- Breadcrumb: [Hem](/) > [Apputvecklingsprogram](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitLab](/software/159806/gitlab) # GitLab Canonical: https://www.capterra.se/software/159806/gitlab Page: 1 / 50\ Nästa: [Next page](https://www.capterra.se/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) > Molnbaserad DevOps-lösning som gör det möjligt för företag att förbättra sina arbetsflödesprocesser med hjälp av tidsuppföljning, regelefterlevnad med mera. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 1226 users. Top-rated for **Sannolikhet att rekommendera**. ----- ## Overview ### Vem använder GitLab? Molnbaserad DevOps-plattform som hjälper små och stora företag att förbättra affärsverksamheten med hjälp av tidsuppföljning, incidenthantering, kodgranskning, regelefterlevnad med mera. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Betygsättning | Detail | | **Totalt** | **4.6/5** | 1226 Recensioner | | Enkel användning | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundtjänst | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Valuta för pengarna | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funktioner | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Sannolikhet att rekommendera) | ## Om leverantören - **Företag**: GitLab - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Startpris**: 29,00 US$ - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Gratis provperiod) - **Target Audience**: Egenföretagare, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Moln, SaaS, webb-baserat, Windows (på platsl), Linux (på plats) - **Supported Languages**: engelska, franska, japanska, kinesiska, tyska - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algeriet, Amerikanska Jungfruöarna, Amerikanska Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua och Barbuda, Argentina, Armenien, Aruba, Australien, Azerbajdzjan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien and 205 more ## Funktioner - API - Anpassningsbara mallar - Applikationssäkerhet - Arbetsflödeshantering - Automated Testing - Buggspårning - Dra och släpp - Efterlevnadskontroll - Ersättningshantering - Felsökning - Fortsatt integration - Förvarshantering - Godkännande arbetsflöde - Grafiskt användargränssnitt - IT-rapportering - Integrerad utvecklingsmiljö - Integrering av kodförvar - Kodgranskning - Kodredigering - Konfigurationshantering - Kontinuerlig distribution - Kontinuerlig leverans - Kvalitetssäkring - Portföljhantering - Prioritering - Problemhantering - Projektplanering - Projektspårning - Rapportering / projektspårning - Real-Time Analytics - Releasehantering - Resurshantering - Samarbetsverktyg - Spåra milstolpar - Sårbarhetsskanning - Testhantering - Third-Party Integrations - Uppgiftshantering - Varningar / Meddelanden - Versionskontroll - Ändringshantering - Åtkomstkontroller / behörigheter - Övervakning ## Integrations (39 total) - Akismet - Anchore - Asana - Assembla - Bamboo - Beyond Identity - Bitbucket - Bridgecrew - Bugzilla - Buildkite - Campfire Blaze - Checkmarx One - Datadog - Deepfactor - Discord ... and 24 more integrations ## Support Options - E-post / Kundtjänst - Vanliga frågor / Forum - Baskunskap - 24/7 (Live-support) - Chatt ## Category - [Apputvecklingsprogram](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Relaterade kategorier - [Apputvecklingsprogram](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Programvara för projektledning, ideell organisation](https://www.capterra.se/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Integrationsverktyg](https://www.capterra.se/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) - [Utvecklingsverktyg](https://www.capterra.se/directory/31120/devops/software) - [Agile Project Management Software](https://www.capterra.se/directory/31556/agile-project-management-tools/software) ## Alternativ 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.se/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15459 reviews) 2. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.se/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2243 reviews) 3. [Odoo](https://www.capterra.se/software/135618/odoo) — 4.2/5 (1323 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.se/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3038 reviews) 5. [Miro](https://www.capterra.se/software/128955/miro) — 4.7/5 (1699 reviews) ## Recensioner ### "A powerful DevOps powerhouse with a dense but complete interface" — 5.0/5 > **Enguerran** | *18 maj 2026* | Sportartiklar | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: GitLab has this biggest edge, like it really leans into a full, everything-in-one DevOps platform kind of approach. You get source code management, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines that are built in, all tied together inside one single interface, and yeah it feels like a huge productivity push. Setting up pipeline stuff through .gitlab-ci.yml is pretty direct, plus the native Container Registry makes it genuinely easy to roll out Docker images, especially during our day to day development sprints. > > **Nackdelar**: The user interface can feel kind of overwhelming and cluttered, especially when you’re trying to move through those deeply nested settings or while reviewing a complex Merge Request. For non-technical folks, like Product Owners who are tracking issues day to day the initial learning curve is pretty steep. On top of that, the self-hosted instance can get resource-heavy and it tends to need regular maintenance so runner performances stay optimal or at least not degrade to much. > > We use GitLab as our main repository hosting and deployment server, it kinda bridges the gap between engineering and QA workflows. It works well, it links things up without too much friction and honestly it feels solid. Being able to lock down branches, spin up runners to automate code quality checks , and then track deployments automatically, gives us huge security and that calm peace of mind. Overall it is an indispensable, sturdy tool for modern team collaboration and DevOps orchestration, even when things get messy, we still stay on track. ----- ### "Convenient and easy to use" — 5.0/5 > **Song** | *16 mars 2026* | Magasinering | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: Project management, project builds, and image repositories. These are the tools we use most frequently in our daily development work, and they’re incredibly useful. I also leverage integrations with project management tools to help me complete projects more effectively. > > **Nackdelar**: So far, I haven’t had any complaints. The company uses the official repository, and I use a locally deployed community repository—both work very well.The Enterprise Edition is more expensive. > > GitLab can support our entire development lifecycle, covering the full process from code management to image management. ----- ### "Lets GITtity Up\!" — 4.0/5 > **Drew** | *5 augusti 2026* | Konsumtionsvaror | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: Having repository management, task tracking, and CI CD pipelines under one roof is a massive advantage. You do not have to glue together multiple third party tools to get code from a commit into production. Built in runner management, web based code editing, and flexible permission controls make code reviews and project coordination seamless across development teams. > > **Nackdelar**: The user interface can feel cluttered and overwhelming because there are so many features packed into every menu. Performance and page load speeds can occasionally lag on larger repositories or heavy self hosted setups. Navigating through project settings to find specific pipeline or access control options can also take a bit of digging. > > Having used GitLab in previous development environments, it served as a reliable single source of truth for our entire software lifecycle. The value for money is strong considering how many separate services it replaces out of the box. Once your team gets past the initial learning curve, the convenience of managing repositories, issues, and deployments in one platform is hard to beat. ----- ### "User interface is too old" — 3.0/5 > **Ahliman** | *30 november 2024* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: I started using GitLab because private repositories were free. I've been using it less since private repositories became free on GitHub as well, but it remains a great tool. A large part of its features are sufficient in the free plan. > > **Nackdelar**: I hate GitLab's interface; it's just my personal opinion, but nothing feels intuitive. They use Cloudflare protection everywhere, the colors, etc., make it look like an old-school Microsoft application. Plus, it’s much less popular than GitHub in terms of open-source projects and community activity. > > GitLab doesn’t have much value for my personal use anymore since I’ve migrated all my projects to GitHub. The only advantage GitLab has is the ability to organize projects into categories (which, unfortunately, isn’t possible on GitHub). Many companies still prefer GitLab for historical reasons, but personally, I prefer GitHub. To me, GitLab and Bitbucket are similar products. ----- ### "The Best All-in-One DevOps Platform, Especially for CI/CD" — 5.0/5 > **Verifierad recensent** | *15 december 2025* | Statsförvaltningen | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: I really appreciate GitLab’s single-application approach—it’s become the backbone of our entire DevOps workflow. The built-in CI/CD pipelines are a game-changer; being able to define the entire build, test, and deployment process in a single .gitlab-ci.yml file right in the repository is so much more efficient than juggling separate tools like Jenkins. We rely heavily on merge requests, and the integrated security scanning (SAST/DAST) is a huge plus—it gives developers immediate feedback during the merge process, which helps us catch issues early and maintain quality without slowing down delivery. > > **Nackdelar**: From my experience, GitLab can feel quite resource-intensive, especially when we’re running a self-hosted instance or dealing with pipelines that include complex jobs. I’ve noticed performance slowdowns when navigating large project backlogs or loading detailed merge request diffs, which can be frustrating during critical reviews. While the UI is generally intuitive, the sheer breadth of features—issues, boards, CI/CD, security—can make the initial setup and configuration overwhelming for new team members. It takes some time and guidance before they feel comfortable. > > In my experience, GitLab has truly streamlined our journey from idea to deployment. As a DevOps Engineer, I rely heavily on its seamless integration of source control, issue tracking, and CI/CD automation to keep our delivery pipeline moving at a high velocity. While I’ve noticed a slight learning curve and occasional performance hiccups at scale, the depth of features—especially the native GitOps capabilities—has made it my go-to platform for modern software development and deployment. It’s a solution that genuinely supports the way we work. ----- Page: 1 / 50\ Nästa: [Next page](https://www.capterra.se/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.se/software/159806/gitlab) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data