--- description: Få detaljerad information om Slack, dess användbarhet, funktioner, pris, fördelar och nackdelar från verifierade användarupplevelser. Läs recensioner och upptäck liknande verktyg på Capterra Sverige. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Slack: Pris och betyg 2026 - Capterra Sverige --- Breadcrumb: [Hem](/) > [CRM-system försäljning](/directory/30798/sales-enablement/software) > [Slack](/software/135003/slack) # Slack Canonical: https://www.capterra.se/software/135003/slack Page: 1 / 970\ Nästa: [Next page](https://www.capterra.se/software/135003/slack?page=2) > Slack samlar all er kommunikation på ett och samma ställe. Det handlar om meddelanden i realtid samt arkiverings- och sökfunktioner för moderna team. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 24221 users. Top-rated for **Sannolikhet att rekommendera**. ----- ## Overview ### Vem använder Slack? Våra kunder sträcker sig från små tvåmannaföretag till Fortune 100-bolag. Faktum är att 77 % av alla Fortune 100-bolag använder Slack. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Betygsättning | Detail | | **Totalt** | **4.7/5** | 24221 Recensioner | | Enkel användning | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundtjänst | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Valuta för pengarna | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funktioner | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Sannolikhet att rekommendera) | ## Om leverantören - **Företag**: Slack - **Location**: San Francisco, USA - **Founded**: 2014 ## Commercial Context - **Startpris**: 8,75 US$ - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Gratis provperiod) - **Target Audience**: Egenföretagare, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Moln, SaaS, webb-baserat, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Supported Languages**: engelska, franska, japanska, spanska, tyska - **Available Countries**: Australien, Belgien, Brasilien, Danmark, Finland, Frankrike, Indien, Irland, Island, Israel, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Kina, Luxemburg, Mexiko, Nederländerna, Norge, Portugal, Schweiz and 6 more ## Funktioner - Aktivitet / Nyhetsflöde - Anteckningshantering - Chatbot - Chatt och meddelanden - Discussions/Forums - Dokumenthantering - Dra och släpp - Fildelning - Fjärrstöd - Fjärråtkomst / kontroll - Flera datakällor - Flera kommunikationskanaler - Fleranvändarsamarbete - Fulltextsökning - Innehållsdelning - Innehållshantering - Inspelning - Kalenderhantering - Kommentarer / Anteckningar - Kommunikationshantering - Kryptering - Kundchatt i realtid - Kunskapsbashantering - Livechatt - Ljudinspelning - Ljudsamtal - Medarbetarkatalog - Medlemskatalog - Mobilåtkomst - Måtta - Presentationsströmning - Privat chatt - Rapportering och analys - Realtidschatt - Realtidssynkronisering - Samarbetsverktyg - Samtalsdirigering - Schemaläggning - Skärmdelning - Skärminspelning - Skärmupptagning - Sök / filtrera - Transkript/chatthistorik - Tvåvägs ljud och video - Tvåvägs ljud och video - Undersökningar och feedback - Uppgiftshantering - Videochatt - Videokonferense - Åtkomstkontroller / behörigheter ... and 14 more features ## Integrations (183 total) - 5pm - Aha\! - Airbrake - Aircall - Airtable - Amplitude - Any.do - AppSignal - Asana - Assembla - Automile - Azuqua - AzureDesk - Baremetrics - Beanstalk ... and 168 more integrations ## Support Options - E-post / Kundtjänst - Vanliga frågor / Forum - Baskunskap - Chatt ## Category - [CRM-system försäljning](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30798/sales-enablement/software) ## Relaterade kategorier - [CRM-system försäljning](https://www.capterra.se/directory/30798/sales-enablement/software) - [Säljprogram](https://www.capterra.se/directory/32195/sales-engagement-platform/software) - [Skärminspelningsprogram](https://www.capterra.se/directory/31975/screen-recording/software) - [Programvara för innehållsamarbeten](https://www.capterra.se/directory/32935/content-collaboration/software) - [Digitala kommunikationsverktyg](https://www.capterra.se/directory/31543/employee-communication-tools/software) ## Alternativ 1. [monday AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.se/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6123 reviews) 2. [Bitrix24](https://www.capterra.se/software/113540/bitrix24) — 4.2/5 (1005 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.se/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13744 reviews) 4. [Basecamp](https://www.capterra.se/software/56808/basecamp) — 4.4/5 (14450 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.se/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3042 reviews) ## Recensioner ### "Slack: Essential for remote work productivity...and employee engagement" — 5.0/5 > **Alicia** | *3 september 2026* | Informationsteknologi och tjänster | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: Since 2020, I've worked remotely as a business developer across two digital services companies. Slack has huge gains for my formal work (e.g., channel-specific topics by deals and projects; a customizable canvas for each channel to link helpful resources; the Huddle feature for impromptu calls; seamless integration with mobile; tons of personalization features to make it right for my workday - hello Focus Mode -; integrations, like with Google Suite that make is easy to share files...the list goes on) And it's also great for employee engagement, especially in a remote setting. With the right people contributing to an engaging company culture, Slack keeps the workday interactive and, dare I say, fun. We have channels to discuss hobbies and special interests, like our corporate Fantasy Football league, book clubs, and channels for working parents to commiserate, encourage one another, and remind us all when it's time to sign the kids up for summer camp (the right answer is February, every year). This is where the magic happens. As an elder millennial, I just love it. I'm efficient with work, and it brings back the best bits of the AIM I grew up on...but for work. It's also super reliable. Over the years and across countries, I've used Slack, I don't think I've ever experienced an outage. > > **Nackdelar**: Honestly, not much. The only time I get frustrated with it is when I need to invite partners (from external companies) into our workspace for targeted deal collaboration. When those folks come from organizations stuck with Teams, it's not easy to get them to adopt it for a limited time, even though it's easy enough to add them to the dedicated Slack workspace. > > Slack has been part of the corporate toolkits of the companies I've worked for since 2017 (across three different companies, from Silicon Valley to digital services work in the government contracting industry). I've used it while working 100% in-office at a globally distributed company; when a company was transitioning to remote during the pandemic's height; and now, at a company that has been remote-first since its inception in 2016. After I used it for the first time at one job, I started asking during interviews whether they used Slack, because I knew it'd be a difference-maker in my onboarding and overall day-to-day expereince. Also, since I started using it in 2017, I've been impressed with the feature rollouts over the years. It hasn't stalled, never gets stale, and keeps getting better. I've never been responsible for comparing Slack to other tools or reviewing corporate pricing, so I don't know the overall value for the money in dollars and cents, but as far as employee engagement goes, companies should seriously consider adopting it. ----- ### "Efficient Team Communication and Collaboration Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Mohammed** | *18 juni 2026* | Forskning | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: Slack makes team communication fast and organized with channels, direct messaging, and integrations. > > **Nackdelar**: Notifications can become overwhelming, and some useful features are limited in the free version. Update this features > > Slack has been a reliable communication platform for collaborating with teams, sharing files, and staying updated on projects. Its channel-based structure keeps conversations organized and easy to follow. ----- ### "Free and Fast in Messaging" — 3.0/5 > **Md** | *24 augusti 2026* | Högre utbildning | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: I am doing some side chatting with collaborator using this. The app is fast, feels there is enough features on the dashboard. > > **Nackdelar**: The app looks kind of old specially the logo. Also. the UI for video call can be made more user friendly. > > It has a feature for muting notifications. It is great, also easy to get into multiple threads for different type of chats. ----- ### "Slack Review" — 3.0/5 > **Dee** | *9 september 2026* | Kundservice | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: Slack is great as team communication, and as a meeting tool. It was easy to set up and quickly utilized among our team. Files, both documents and picture was easily shared without any hiccup. > > **Nackdelar**: Occasional missed notification caused us several miscommunication among the team despite setting it on for notification. The side bar on the app or the desktop platform became cumbersome. ----- ### "Excellent for engineering team comms, with real cost and noise tradeoffs" — 4.0/5 > **Koshish** | *10 september 2026* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fördelar**: The channel based structure holds up as an org grows. The feature I lean on hardest is search with modifiers like in:, from:, and before:, which reliably surfaces the one thread from eight months ago where someone explained a deploy quirk. The integration surface is the real value for an engineering team: incoming webhooks, the Events API, and Workflow Builder let us pipe CI results, on call pages, and alarm state into the channel that owns the service, so triage happens in one place instead of across three tools. Huddles are low friction enough that we use them instead of scheduling a call, which has cut a lot of meeting overhead. Slack Connect has replaced most email threads with external vendors. Uptime has been solid, and once you learn the keyboard shortcuts the client is fast to navigate. > > **Nackdelar**: The desktop app is heavy. With a dozen workspaces and busy channels it will sit on several gigabytes of memory, and cold start is slow on older hardware. Threads are still the weak spot: an important decision often lives inside a thread while the channel shows nothing, so context gets buried unless someone remembers to also send it to the channel. Per seat pricing adds up quickly at scale, and the message history limit on the free plan makes a real trial hard. Notification tuning is entirely on the user and the defaults are noisy, so new hires spend their first month drowning. Search across multiple workspaces is still clumsy compared to search within one. Canvas has not been good enough to replace an actual document tool for us. > > Slack has become the default place work happens rather than just another chat tool. For day to day engineering work it sits at the center: design discussion, code review pings, deploy and alarm notifications, and incident response all land in channels owned by the team that owns the service, which makes handoffs and postmortems much easier because the timeline is already written down. The searchable history is what makes it worth the price, since a lot of institutional knowledge that would otherwise be lost stays recoverable. The tradeoffs are cost at headcount and the discipline required to keep channels from turning into noise. Neither is a dealbreaker, but both need active management. I would pick it again. ----- Page: 1 / 970\ Nästa: [Next page](https://www.capterra.se/software/135003/slack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.se/software/135003/slack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data